Stolen from Dan Mitchell's very excellent blog. Though I suspect that he too stole them.
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Monday, December 31, 2012
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Keith "Crybaby" Olbermann
There are a couple of things that get under my skin. Ticks, chiggers, suppurating sores and Keith Olbermann.
I was really hoping that this whiny excuse for a man was well and truly out of it when he went to that dumb vanity outlet run by Gore, Current, but, no. Freddy Kruger like the world of Media is exposed to yet more Olbermann drama.
I don't want to give this sniveling candy ass any more time than he has already clawed from the precious store allocated to each of us by the gods of Oak, Ash and Thorn except to observe that to have the sort of big media manhood that he thinks he should have (and amusingly swings around, to the danger of no one) YOU HAVE TO HAVE AN AUDIENCE!!!!
Jesus Christ perusing a NAD book but this guy really deserves an ass kicking. He is like the media equivalent of Paris Hilton: famous for being famous with only a modicum of talent and that talent apparent only on a grainy example that you have to squint at in order to make anything out.
I invited Keith's five viewers over the other day to get their opinion. Even they were about fed up with this crybaby. So, Keith, hasta la vista and don't let the door hit your fat ass on the way out.
Sorry folks, I had no intention of writing about this jerk, but I saw this column in the Times (NY) and thought to myself "Sandman, Carr has it half right, you better jump in". Fact, Carr, is that this has nothing to do with pro sports because the number of people who would go to an event to see Olbermann wouldn't fill a damn pisser under the bleachers. Different. Just because Olbermann is a whiny liberal dies not give him talent and it sure as hell does not give him an audience. Actually, the reverse probably.
Even my liberal friends (yeah, I have a few, I'll tell you about them sometime) would like to kick his ass. Just for being so damn annoying.
Till next time amigos.
MJ
I was really hoping that this whiny excuse for a man was well and truly out of it when he went to that dumb vanity outlet run by Gore, Current, but, no. Freddy Kruger like the world of Media is exposed to yet more Olbermann drama.
I don't want to give this sniveling candy ass any more time than he has already clawed from the precious store allocated to each of us by the gods of Oak, Ash and Thorn except to observe that to have the sort of big media manhood that he thinks he should have (and amusingly swings around, to the danger of no one) YOU HAVE TO HAVE AN AUDIENCE!!!!
Jesus Christ perusing a NAD book but this guy really deserves an ass kicking. He is like the media equivalent of Paris Hilton: famous for being famous with only a modicum of talent and that talent apparent only on a grainy example that you have to squint at in order to make anything out.
I invited Keith's five viewers over the other day to get their opinion. Even they were about fed up with this crybaby. So, Keith, hasta la vista and don't let the door hit your fat ass on the way out.
Sorry folks, I had no intention of writing about this jerk, but I saw this column in the Times (NY) and thought to myself "Sandman, Carr has it half right, you better jump in". Fact, Carr, is that this has nothing to do with pro sports because the number of people who would go to an event to see Olbermann wouldn't fill a damn pisser under the bleachers. Different. Just because Olbermann is a whiny liberal dies not give him talent and it sure as hell does not give him an audience. Actually, the reverse probably.
Even my liberal friends (yeah, I have a few, I'll tell you about them sometime) would like to kick his ass. Just for being so damn annoying.
Till next time amigos.
MJ
Monday, March 19, 2012
More on Mr. Woozer
You know, I've been watching the Republicans self destruct over the past couple of weeks and I gotta say that it has the attraction of watching a train wreck. I'd really like to write about some other stuff but I find myself staring like a lunatic at their antics. Correct me if I am wrong but isn't a litmus test of conservative principles the belief that the central government should keeps it's damn paws out of your personal business? I'm not crazy, right? The latest is that Mr. Woozer (the vile Santorum person) has decided that the feds should regulate porn. WTF is that about? Like the War On Drugs is such a smashing success that we need the Feds to wage war on porn. And what is that going to cost us? And what bureaucracy will that require? And what liberties will be infringed as the feds go galloping thru every one's computer records to find evidence of ... Porn ... Jesus Christ. And, BTW, what the hell is the definition of porn in the first place? What Woozer thinks it is?
And, naturally, it's for the children.
I'm telling you: This guy is a liberal of the worst sort. He thinks that the government can cure all ills, and that to do so all we need are more laws. And, by the way, he knows whats Right and Wrong. Idiot. Like I would ever ever ever trust a politician to determine what I should or should not be doing. The louder one of these lowlifes howls about something the surer I am that whatever it is they are concerned about and don't want you to do is a big part of their lives. So far Mr. Woozer is upset about gays and porn. Draw your own conclusions.
I'm ill.
Edited to add:
In case you think I am making this stuff up, let me assure you that even my fertile imagination could not create the madness that is Rick Santorum. Read his approved message here:
http://www.ricksantorum.com/enforcing-laws-against-illegal-pornography
Mark my words folks, this guy is going to destroy the Republican Party if he is nominated and will ensure four more years <shivver> of Mr. O.
And, naturally, it's for the children.
I'm telling you: This guy is a liberal of the worst sort. He thinks that the government can cure all ills, and that to do so all we need are more laws. And, by the way, he knows whats Right and Wrong. Idiot. Like I would ever ever ever trust a politician to determine what I should or should not be doing. The louder one of these lowlifes howls about something the surer I am that whatever it is they are concerned about and don't want you to do is a big part of their lives. So far Mr. Woozer is upset about gays and porn. Draw your own conclusions.
I'm ill.
Edited to add:
In case you think I am making this stuff up, let me assure you that even my fertile imagination could not create the madness that is Rick Santorum. Read his approved message here:
http://www.ricksantorum.com/enforcing-laws-against-illegal-pornography
Mark my words folks, this guy is going to destroy the Republican Party if he is nominated and will ensure four more years <shivver> of Mr. O.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)